breast cancer rates
breast cancer rates or survival
Breast cancer rates are often used by private insurance defenders that our health care is better than socialized health care in other countries, like france, canada, switzerland etc So does that mean that if we implement the public option or even UHC our breast cancer rates of survival will drop? If you believe so, can you explain how?
I think it is the rationing of medicine to treat advanced and used in after surgery they are quoting.
The other countries have no other option but to ration certain medicines and refuse to offer others due to their costs and due to their socialized medicine has to be held in “financial check”.
While I do not think anyone uses this as their main objection to socialized health care, it is a reality that will have to be dealt with.
The guy above mentioned the incentives for future development so I will skip that part.
The American Cancer Society’s most recent estimates for breast cancer rates in the United States are for 2010:
- The breast cancer rates for new cases of breast cancer is about 207,090 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women.
- The breast cancer rates for for new cases of carcinoma is about 54,010 new cases of carcinoma in situ (CIS) will be diagnosed (CIS is non-invasive and is the earliest form of breast cancer).
- The breast cancer rates for survival is about 39,840 women will die from breast cancer.
breast cancer rates
Originally posted 2010-03-08 19:37:40.
Save the Ta Tas
References :
yes
References :
how would that even work
that’s like saying if you eat a box of cyanide but live in a country where the health care is completely capitalist you;d be fine
References :
I think it is the rationing of medicine to treat advanced and used in after surgery they are quoting.
The other countries have no other option but to ration certain medicines and refuse to offer others due to their costs and due to their socialized medicine has to be held in "financial check".
While I do not think anyone uses this as their main objection to socialized health care, it is a reality that will have to be dealt with.
The guy above mentioned the incentives for future development so I will skip that part.
References :
Breast cancer deaths will in all likelihood rise if the public option becomes the only option for most. Breast cancer as well as deaths from several other diseases are higher in countries that have socialized medicine. Just the public option itself will not do this…but many see the public option as only the first step in a gradual slide downward to socialized medicine. Environment and heredity play a vital role in who gets breast cancer, but quick and reliable treatment for it is the key to a cure for those who do get it. In socialized medicine, it is a fact that people do have to wait a couple weeks or month longer to see a doctor..even longer for a specialist and surgeries…and for some kinds of rapidly moving breast cancers, those two weeks or so could well make a difference in the patients chance for survival.
As far as improving someone’s odds, medicine has come a long way in twenty five years since my husbands first wife got breast cancer. With todays treatments and tests to check for problems, she would probably have still been alive today. By the time it was found, it was to late. Prevention is the best treatment of all, not only for breast cancer but for countless other diseases as well. In my opinion, we would be far better off making sure that everyone in the country has FREE checks for things like breast, colon, uterine or prostrate cancer and diabetes than to worry about the other end of the spectrum. If you prevent the disease, you won’t have huge life destroying bills at the end.
References :
Yes survival rates will drop because people will have to wait long for treatment because there will be more patients per doctor. Also more specialists will leave the practice as reimbursement rates drop.
References :